Reviewed by PeptideGuide Research TeamLast updated February 15, 2026

Medical Disclaimer

This content is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical advice. Always consult a qualified healthcare provider before using any peptide.Read full disclaimer

Back to Comparisons

Humanin vs SS-31 (Elamipretide)

Complete side-by-side comparison of Humanin and SS-31 (Elamipretide).

Comparative Analysis

SS-31 (Elamipretide) and Humanin represent two distinct approaches to mitochondrial-targeted anti-aging therapy, each operating through unique mechanisms to combat cellular senescence and age-related decline. SS-31 functions as a mitochondria-targeting peptide that selectively binds to cardiolipin, a unique phospholipid found exclusively in the inner mitochondrial membrane. This targeted interaction stabilizes the mitochondrial membrane structure, optimizes electron transport chain efficiency, and reduces harmful reactive oxygen species production. By directly addressing mitochondrial dysfunction at its source, SS-31 helps restore cellular energy production and protects against oxidative damage that accumulates with aging. Humanin operates through a different paradigm, functioning as a mitochondrial-derived peptide that acts as a cellular survival signal. Originally discovered as a neuroprotective factor, Humanin exerts its anti-aging effects by interacting with multiple receptor systems, including the IGFBP-3 receptor complex and various death receptors. This multi-receptor approach allows Humanin to modulate apoptotic pathways, enhance cellular stress resistance, and promote longevity signaling cascades. Unlike SS-31's direct mitochondrial membrane stabilization, Humanin works through downstream signaling mechanisms that influence cellular fate decisions and metabolic regulation. The therapeutic applications of these peptides reflect their distinct mechanisms. SS-31 has shown particular promise in cardiovascular applications, with clinical trials demonstrating benefits in heart failure, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and mitochondrial cardiomyopathy. Its ability to rapidly restore mitochondrial function makes it valuable for acute interventions and conditions where immediate mitochondrial support is crucial. The peptide's selectivity for damaged or stressed mitochondria provides targeted therapy with minimal off-target effects. Humanin's broader receptor interactions translate to more diverse therapeutic potential, including neuroprotection, metabolic regulation, and systemic anti-aging effects. Research has highlighted its role in protecting against Alzheimer's disease, diabetes, and age-related cognitive decline. The peptide's ability to modulate multiple longevity pathways simultaneously makes it attractive for comprehensive anti-aging strategies, though this complexity may also introduce more variable responses between individuals. From a clinical development perspective, SS-31 has advanced further through the regulatory pipeline, with extensive Phase II and Phase III trials providing substantial safety and efficacy data. Its well-defined mechanism and measurable mitochondrial outcomes facilitate clinical assessment and dosing optimization. Humanin, while showing promising preclinical results, remains earlier in clinical development, with ongoing research focused on understanding optimal dosing regimens and identifying the most responsive patient populations. Both peptides demonstrate excellent safety profiles, though long-term data remains limited for comprehensive anti-aging applications.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Property
Humanin
SS-31 (Elamipretide)
Name
Humanin
SS-31 (Elamipretide)
Peptide Class
Mitochondrial-derived peptide
Mitochondria-targeting peptide
Category
Anti-Aging
Anti-Aging
Dosage Range
0.5 mg to 5 mg per day
0.1 to 0.5 mg/kg daily
Half-Life
N/A
4 hours
FDA Status
Not Approved
Investigational
Safety Rating
Research Only
Research Only
Cost Estimate
$200-400/month
N/A

Key Differences

  • 1

    SS-31 directly targets and stabilizes cardiolipin in the inner mitochondrial membrane, providing immediate structural support to mitochondria, while Humanin works through receptor-mediated signaling cascades that influence cellular survival and longevity pathways over time.

  • 2

    SS-31 has advanced through extensive Phase III clinical trials with established safety and efficacy data, particularly for cardiovascular applications, whereas Humanin remains in earlier clinical development stages with primarily preclinical evidence supporting its anti-aging potential.

  • 3

    SS-31 demonstrates selective targeting of damaged or stressed mitochondria, providing focused therapeutic effects with minimal off-target activity, while Humanin's multi-receptor interactions create broader systemic effects but with potentially more variable individual responses.

  • 4

    SS-31 excels in acute interventions and conditions requiring immediate mitochondrial support, such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, while Humanin appears better suited for chronic, preventive anti-aging strategies and neuroprotective applications.

  • 5

    SS-31's mechanism allows for direct measurement of mitochondrial function improvements, facilitating precise dosing and monitoring, whereas Humanin's complex signaling effects require assessment through multiple biomarkers and longer-term outcome measures.

Which Should You Choose?

The choice between SS-31 and Humanin depends on your specific anti-aging goals and health priorities. Choose SS-31 if you're seeking targeted mitochondrial support with proven clinical backing, particularly for cardiovascular health or acute mitochondrial dysfunction. Its direct mechanism and advanced clinical development make it ideal for those wanting evidence-based mitochondrial therapy with predictable outcomes. Opt for Humanin if you prefer a broader anti-aging approach that addresses multiple longevity pathways simultaneously, especially for neuroprotection and metabolic health. Humanin's multi-receptor activity offers comprehensive cellular protection but with less clinical certainty. Consider SS-31 for immediate, measurable mitochondrial benefits, while Humanin may be better suited for long-term, systemic anti-aging strategies. Both peptides can potentially complement each other in comprehensive anti-aging protocols, as their mechanisms don't directly overlap.